Final Blog Post: My Online Presence

I was born in 2002, this means that I grew up with electronics and social media. However, I am the youngest in my family which means I had to follow the same rules my older siblings did. I did grow up watching cartoons and kids shows on television, like all kids my age, but I did not receive my first phone until I was in sixth grade and it only could call and text. I received my first smartphone (iPhone) when I was fourteen years old and was very excited to craft my online presence. Thankfully, people told me to be very careful with what I posted on social media because anyone can have access to it, but that did not stop me from creating these social media profiles and putting my personal information online. 

I have a Facebook account, Snapchat account, Instagram account, YouTube account, Netflix account and a Pinterest account. When I googled myself for this post, the only sites that showed up were my LinkedIn and Facebook. However, when I scrolled down further, I found a website called the Next College Student Athlete (NCSA). I was on the varsity golf team in high school and this website somehow had my personal information such as: my height, my weight, what sport I played, the high school I attended, my home town, and the year I graduated high school. 

Having personal information about me online is scary, but with all of the tools and contraptions the government has put in place such as, the trackers on police cars I talked about in my last blog, and the facial scanners in China that track everyone and rate people on their social grade, does not make much of a difference because our personal information will get released to the government one way or another. 

Even though I feel that I am not on my phone as much as some of my peers, my phone's screen time statistics state that I spend a daily average of three hours and forty minutes on my phone. This daily average does not include how much time I spend on my computer watching television or doing homework assignments. This gives me an unhealthy perception of what the world really is because I spend half my time connecting through a tiny computer.

As I continue to utilize technology in my personal and professional life, I want to create more limits on my habits and attempt to monitor my personal information that is available to the public. While there is always going to be some things that slip through the cracks, the more that we pay attention, the better chance we have of keeping private information private.

Blog Post #12: EOTO Presentations Round 2

The second round of presentations was very interesting to me. I have heard of these terms and concepts without knowing the definitions. For example, disinformation is people deliberately produce wrong information to prove their stature of power. It is also known as "fake news," I have heard of fake news before, mostly associated with Trump, but I never knew the proper term was disinformation. 

Another thing I found out about was the Total Information Awareness Program, they get data on us and release it to the government. An example of this is a website called Next College Student Athlete (NCSA). I googled myself to see what information popped up and this website had some suspicious results a suspicious result. They had some of my personal information that I am not sure as to how they gained that information.This is a scary topic because it applies to almost every person in the world due to the amount of information about us that is online.  

The last term I learned about that I knew of, but never knew what it meant was a "whistle blower." Whistler blowers know of wrong doing by the government and alert the public. For the longest time I thought whistle blowers were the bad people committing the wrong doing, maybe that is because that is what the government wants us to believe. Eric Snowden is a prime example of this misunderstood term. He is a man was put in jail for alerting the public about classified information that was stolen from the National Security Association (NSA) and leaked. However, the man who did the original illegal act is not in jail. Eric Snowden is plastered as the bad guy because it is easier to blame the person who spoke up for the wrong doing they witnessed. 

These terms have gone right over my head in the past, and I was quick to believe anything I was told. This class has taught me to do my own research and create my own opinions so you do not get scammed by these power hungry companies and automatically believe what they tell you. The truth is, more often than not, the major companies are lying or fibbing to cover the possible illegal acts they are committing. 

Blog Post #11: Privacy, Online & Off

While we think that we are guaranteed certain rights as citizens, this class has taught me that many of our rights are restricted and the government does a great job of finding loopholes.

The first TED talk we watched was about four subjects that seemed like they did not go together at all, but ended up tying in nicely with the theme of the presentation at the end. The four topics were: big idea, tattoos, immortality, and the Greeks. Juan Enriquez, the presenter, stated "tattoos really do shout." They tell a story without saying anything. Social media sites are electronic tattoos that "provide as much information about who and what you are as any tattoo ever would." Juan then went on to describe that our online presence is immortal because it will live on long after our lives end. This is why our online presence is so important and we should be very careful what we put on the internet and protect our passwords because who knows what people could find out about us when we are not here to defend ourselves, or even when we are here. 

The second TED talk we watched was less interesting, but still had important information that was shocking to find out. Police cars have scanners on their cars that quickly scan the cars that drive by and pull up a track record on that person and car including their criminal record. These scanners basically rate how good of a person you are and the more things you have on your record, the more likely you are to get pulled over for something minor; where as a clean person might not get pulled over for doing the same illegal thing as the person with the track record. 

I wish that the rights we were given actually apply to us in every situation they are supposed to apply in. The government has way too much power over the public. However, it is our job to educate ourselves about our rights and stand up for ourselves to protect our rights and privacy.

Blog Post #10: EOTO Terms and Concepts

The theory I studied was the spiral of silence. This theory is the "theory that people’s willingness to express their opinions on controversial public issues is affected by their largely unconscious perception of those opinions as being either popular or unpopular." This theory is rooted in the study of human communication and social psychology. Individuals recognize that their actions are individuals are aware that their actions are “seen by all” or “heard by all." It was "developed by German survey and communication researcher Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann in the 1960s and ’70s." The spiral of silence involves public opinion which is the opinions or behavior of the public without risking social isolation. This means that the theory is strictly social, is not involved in the legal process, and affects everyone regardless of social class. 

The theory arose with a surprising discovery regarding the 1965 German federal election campaign. The discovery was that most of the population's intended votes were tied between the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SDP) and the Christian Democratic Union–Christian Social Union (CDU-CSU). Within the last few weeks, the votes changed to be in favor of CDU-CSU. Long story short, CDU won based on public persuasion due to a visit by Queen Elizabeth II to Germany in May 1965. "Interestingly, while voters’ intentions remained unchanged over the course of many months, their expectations regarding the outcome of the election shifted dramatically during the same period." This election included the bandwagon effect and the votes shifted because of this. 

An important element of this theory is the fact that people are innate followers, meaning they will go with the crowd, because most people have a fear of isolation making them monitor their behavior and look for signs of disapproval. Due to the fear of isolation, people tend to refrain from speaking their own views. However, people who are confident theirs is a common opinion do so fearlessly; but there is still fear of isolation, in turn, this equals the spiral. On the flip side, they issue their own threats of isolation also known as "isolation pressure." Some examples of this are "criticizing someone, turning away from someone, scowling at someone, laughing at someone." 

This theory is unique because it is different with every generation and even with every group. For example, a group of activists might be very outspoken and not have a problem saying their opinion. However, they might make their enemies exercise this theory because aggression can make people exercise the fear of isolation too. 

The spiral of silence is one of the most cited and replicated theories in social sciences due to how applicable the theory is to society. However, there are many factors, such as media, that can deceive public opinion and change the rules of this theory. For example, people are more likely to speak out over social media because it is not a face-to-face confrontation with humanity, you can hide behind your screen. Conversely, public opinion stabilizes society and some conflicts are resolved by the spiral. This theory is crucial to society and can be both beneficial and detrimental. 

Blog Post #9: Diffusion of Innovations

YouTube was invented in 2005 by Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, and Jawed Karim. It originally started out as a site used for sharing home videos; however, it quickly became more. "By the summer of 2006, YouTube was serving more than 100 million videos per day." People of all ages were posted videos to share with family, friends, and strangers. 

The site spread like wildfire due to its easy access and fact that anyone could post anything with little restrictions. The wide plethora of videos to watch within different genres appealed to everyone because you could choose what to watch. People such as PewDiePie and the Smosh Brothers became celebrities through the website, simply because the audience liked what they were putting out into the world. Now, there are many famous YouTubers, but they are in somewhat of a different category than cinema celebrities. Anyone can become famous on YouTube if you have the dedication and drive. I think this is what makes the site so successful; people love ways to get fast cash, especially if you can film what you do an a daily basis, post it, and make a living doing that. 

Another element of YouTube that I think makes it popular is the vanity of the posters. The so called "YouTubers," or at least some of them, for that matter, make their videos personal to their life and might even film vlogs. Vlogs are a video dairy of what you do in a day. This element of realism and genuineness makes viewers feel close to the person, like they are friends, and offers afresh take from cinema that is staged and rehearsed. 

YouTube is still a huge phenomenon today, however, there are major downsides the the quick and easy access YouTube allows. There are not many restrictions on the site because it was never intended to be somewhat of a streaming service for all types of videos. For example, Netflix subscribers are able to change the settings for children. The "kids mode" only allows them to see shows and movies that are rated PG and they don't even have access to any other cinema. YouTube has some restrictions set in place, such as, if there is a video with explicit content of a certain level of nudity, it will lock the video until you log in with your google account proving you are of age to watch that content. Also, YouTube will demonetize a video if it has inappropriate content, a copyrighted song, or sensitive subjects. A demonetization just means the poster will not get paid for that video, but it is not taken down. However, there are easy ways to get around these restrictions and the videos are not very well monitored. 

I am finding more and more kids watching YouTube as their main source of content, which concerns me. This site does not require the content creators to go through a screening process of any kind or make sure the information they are stating is correct. So, you never know if the information you are learning on YouTube is accurate. A possible solution could be to have different formats for different age groups. Also to screen the content and check for accuracy.

Blog Post #8: EOTO Presentations

This project was such an awesome idea for presenting on the different forms of technology. I learned so many new things about these devices which I have known about for years. Netflix is a streaming site that I use every day. They revolutionized streaming for the modern age and pushed DVD rentals into extinction. Netflix started out exclusively as a rental service, but when their streaming software became fast enough, they ended their DVD production. This was Netflix's biggest controversy because they were one of the most popular DVD rental services. 

Streaming services are very useful today, but would not be around if the TV was not invented. The world's first tv was invented by Philo Taylor Farnsworth. TV originally was in black and white but switched to color in 1954 by the network CNN.  

On the topic of media, Facebook is one of the most popular social networking services. However,  it was originally intended to be exclusively for Harvard and was going to be named The Harvard Connection in 2003.

Without newspapers, we would have never had communicative websites like Facebook. The newspaper started in Britain in the 1640s and was called the British News Books. A form of communication that existed even before newspapers was the telegraph. The development of the telegraph was the voltaic cell in the 1800s which made it possible to power electric devices on a very low voltage. 

One of the most interesting facts I learned from a group presentation was that drones were actually invented in 1782 by the Montgolfier Brothers. The design was a simple balloon such as a hot air balloon. They had simple purposes at first such as filming from a different view, but now they are used to discover areas we cannot access on land and capture images and video of stupendous monuments. 

All of these inventions were crucial to the electronic world we live in now. Also, there will be even more inventions within even the next twenty years that will pave the way for the future electronic world. 

Blog Post #7: The Progressive Era

The questions Prof. Smith proposed on the class blog about why it is hard to find anti-war websites and articles really got me thinking, "why is it hard to find anti-war websites and why have I never thought about this before?" Antiwar.com has a bold statement at the top of their website that states, "It seems like not a day goes by without the US escalating tensions with a major nuclear power, whether it be Russia or China. Antiwar.com is the place to find the news and views on the new Cold Wars. Whether it's US warships sailing through the South China Sea, or the Biden administration slapping sanctions on Russian officials, we cover it all. But we can't do it without you!" This grabbed my attention because I have never been to an antiwar site and they are "hidden" for a reason. 

The Sedition Act, which was signed in 1918 making speaking out against war a crime. This might be one reason why antiwar websites are not mentioned on mainstream television. At first, the Sedition Act dealt mainly with the "quasi war." However, "The sweeping language of the Sedition Act made it illegal, among other actions, to “write, print, utter or publish...any false, scandalous and malicious writing...with intent to defame the...government,”. So, if it is only illegal to write and publish false information about war, it is confusing as to why people do not hear about these anti war websites. 

I personally am Switzerland when it comes to war because I do not know enough about war in general. However, I do think that war is not the solution to everything, especially the way we are doing it now that does not solve a thing. We train America to create a problem and react to it out of angst instead of trying to solve it quietly. Many of the things that our government does that are illegal such as stealing oil from Syria, yet we worry about anti war websites breaking the law.

The lines of illegal and legal anti war speech is very fine and that is why I think these websites are few and far between. Most people are more scared of the punishments than the impact the movement could cause. There is no shortage of strong pro war news articles and statements that are advertised by mainstream media. I wonder if the government was reached out to these antiwar websites and threatened to sue under the first amendment. If so, that is why it is important to know your rights and know for yourself what you are allowed to do.