Sunday, March 28, 2021

Blog Post #3: My Favorites of the 8 Values

1. Marketplace of Ideas: 

John Milton has a theory that, to my understanding, if everyone speaks freely and puts their ideas out into the world, the truth will eventually come out and rise to the top. I like this theory because the first amendment follows these same guidelines. If James Madison wanted the first amendment to be more strict and not allow people to speak freely on all topics, then he would have changed his wording to make it less vague. This theory is very prevalent today with our current political state. Not everyone, including me, agrees with complete freedom of speech. However, when our country is going through such difficult times like our current situation, people need to speak freely so we can hear all points of view.


I feel like this theory is not a great argument for freedom of speech. If everyone offers their opinion, we cannot assume that the truth will come out of that. In many situations that America has already experienced, when there are too many opinions and ideas, people get confused and no one can come up with an answer. However, this theory could work better than what we currently have going on which is, too many people having one unified opinion and sticking to it. When James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights, he intended for our country to be separated by parties, but for every party to be equally represented in the Senate and for people to be able to compromise. Even if you don't like what people have to say, how could it be the government's job to control their voice? 


There is a reason these 8 values are just theories and that is because there will never be a way to word the first amendment to please everyone and not allow any room for error. People can have their own opinions about what people should or should not be able to say, but because humans are impressionable, we can be persuaded to any side of an argument. 


5. Watchdog Rule:

Vince Blasi's theory on the first amendment is that everyone needs to have freedom of speech and press to alert people about governmental actions. We can't just rely on journalists and they cannot just rely on the public. Blasi stated, “check the abuse of power by public officials” in his article called, "The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory.” We have to be united in our freedom, but not necessarily in our ideas. I completely agree with this because I feel as if a lot of our rights are already taken away from us, especially as young adults; with an emphasis on adults. Even though we are young we still have all the same rights as older adults and our voice matters. Without freedom of speech, our only liberty would be going to the voting polls every four years instead of being a part of the discussion. 


Even though I agree with Blasi's idea, it is not so white or black. Technically everyone has freedom of speech and everyone can vote, but there are still rules and discrimination that stop people from being able to do so. Just like before the Jim Crow era, living communities were segregated by white people communities and black people communities. This was a de facto law that they had to be segregated, which means 'a fact of life,' but not a law set by a jury such as de jure. Of course rules switched over to de jure during the Jim Crow era and black people legally could not do a lot of things, but it is important to know the difference between de facto and de jure and to know your legal rights in general because people cannot always stop you from doing something even if they think they can. 


The ideal situation would be to stick to the constitution and give everyone their rights. However, it is common knowledge that poor people, people of color, or anyone else who doesn't fit the "classic American" description get's treated as less than. I hope and pray that one day our United States would actually be united and stay true to what our founding fathers intended to mean in the Constitution. 

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Blog Post #2: The Supreme Court

I did not know much about The Supreme Court before watching these videos other than a basic description of what it was and knowing that they uphold the constitution while making the most important decisions in America. I learned that, The Supreme Court is the most powerful judicial body on earth. When a body has this much power, it can be scary because they have the power to decide people's fate. The legitimacy of the Supreme Court comes from the constitution, but the power depends on the public faith. This is a very important thing to remind the public because even though the Supreme Court has a lot of power, they only get that from the public. 


In the history of the Supreme Court, there have been about 100 justices serving an average of sixteen years. There are certain positions within the Supreme Court such as chief justice. John Marshall was one of the most influential chief justice's. He was elected in 1801 and under his power, the court asserted, "the greatest of all judicial powers, striking down an act of Congress as unconstitutional." 


Another interesting thing I learned from the two videos assigned was that the Supreme Court receives more than 100 new cases every week equaling a total of about 7,000 cases per year. These cases are sorted through and delivered to the nine judges of the Supreme court and tested in a trial court. When making the final vote on cases, the nine are left alone in a room without law clerks or secretaries to debate their opinions. The final step is writing an opinion piece on the legal reasons of the case and releasing them to the public. The final step exercises the first amendment, freedom of the press.


The most important take away I took from the videos about the Supreme Court were: their ultimate power depends on the public's faith, you have to be extremely smart and hard-working to be on the court due to the amount of work, and it is an essential part of our political system. Even though the videos were outdated a bit and things have changed a lot since then, I feel as though they did a great job of educating the audience on the framework of the Supreme Court.  

The most surprising thing I learned about the Supreme Court was that they make their final decision without any secretaries or law clerks. That means that to be apart of the nine, you have to be very trusted, care a lot about history and politics, and stand your ground on what you think is in the best interest of the public. 


The video made me realize that the public is more involved in the Supreme Court than I thought. Also, that the people on the court matter and that's why voting is so important so the people you support can make decisions you agree with.

Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Blog Post #1: My Top Five News Sources

 My Top Five News Sources

1. The Washington Post
I would recommend this news source because the Washington Post has great credentials and is very widely circulated. It was founded in 1877 so it has had plenty of time to develop a great team of journalists and work out the kinks of the company. Not only is The Post a well-respected news source, but the format of it is very aesthetically pleasing. When I was in high school, I had to present four news articles four times a year in a very professional manner. My teacher put The Washington Post, along with a couple of others, as reliable news sources we could use to find our sources for presenting. So, this source is very reliable and trustworthy to get information and stories off of. 

2. The New York Times
The New York Times is also one of the most respected news sources. When most people think of news sources, The NYT and The Post are most likely the sources they think of. It has a worldwide readership and was founded in 1851. It is easy to filter the articles to a subject or topic you are looking for by going to the browser bar at the top of the website. However, sometimes I am not able to open some articles because you have to have a subscription to view them.

3. Huffington Post

The Huffington Post is also a reliable source but is not formatted as ascetically pleasing as the first two. I use this source and the first two as my main sources when researching articles for a school project. It was founded in 2005 so it does not have as long  a history as the first two, but that does not determine whether the source is reliable or not. 

4. Buzzfeed News
Buzzfeed is an American based news source that was founded in 2006. It is not a very reliable news source. I use it sometimes as a bad reference if I need one or if I see a story pop up on my social media. The reason they are not reliable is, that unlike The Post, the majority of the stories are not factual. Their stories are more based on assumptions and pop culture updates. 

5. Snapchat
Snapchat has news stories on the explore page. They are not very reliable because they usually are not written by scholarly journalists and have to do mostly with pop culture. The reason I put this as one of my sources is that I view the stories sometimes due to connivance from already being on the app. However, I would not recommend this as a source to use for academic research. 

Final Blog Post: My Online Presence

I was born in 2002, this means that I grew up with electronics and social media. However, I am the youngest in my family which means I had t...